Commonwealth Journal

Letters

August 11, 2011

Nuisance Law is Ambiguous

Somerset — Dear Editor,

We were especially interested in Heather Tomlinson’s article in the Commonwealth Journal’s July 31 edition concerning the Pulaski County “nuisance” ordinance. Our recent experience with Pulaski County Fiscal Court Ordinance No. 930.1 demonstrates not only ambiguity, but that the ordinance does not go far enough to protect residents from property owner abuses and neglect, and to eliminate public nuisances.

We live in a partially wooded residential area, and residents take great pride in their homes and landscaping. Actions by owners (wealthy, prominent citizens of Pulaski County) of nine lots in our community cause substantial annoyance to our community, interfere with residents’ enjoyment of their properties, reduce property values, create fire hazards and may have violated a community restriction regarding business use.

The owners logged the properties of the largest trees to sell as timber, leaving huge piles of small trees and branches that remain after nine months. Although owners of other undeveloped lots in the community keep their lots mowed and clean of such debris, the owners of these nine lots have refused to do the same, ignoring a request by all residents of the community to do so. As a result, these lots are not being maintained in a manner consistent with a residential community, creating a public nuisance.

Based on the provision of the county ordinance that states it “shall apply to unmowed or unmaintained lots in subdivisions,” we filed a formal nuisance complaint with Pulaski County on behalf of the residents.

The ordinance states that “discarded items constitute a public nuisance, detrimental to the welfare and convenience of the inhabitants of Pulaski County” and that “it is the public policy of this county to prohibit the keeping of discarded items on private property within the unincorporated limits of the county and such discarded items are hereby declared to be public nuisances.”

Regardless, the review board determined that the ordinance does not address the situation in our community. Apparently, this determination is based on the ordinance’s stating that discarded items “includes, but not limited to household refuse, items for or used in recycling, motor vehicles, auto body parts, tires, boats, home appliances and furniture, in a dilapidated or apparently inoperable condition ... discarded on private property for more than thirty (30) consecutive days.”

Since this definition of discarded items includes household refuse and is not limited to what is specified, the debris left on these nine lots could certainly be considered discarded items left by the logging process.

Nine months far exceeds 30 consecutive days.

If the definition is too restrictive for common sense judgments, then it needs to be improved. It seems the “unmaintained lots in subdivisions” provision had no bearing on the review board’s decision.

That such wide disparity occurs when applying Pulaski County’s “nuisance” ordinance attests to its weakness and poor enforcement.

Conditions cited in Kentucky statutes regarding nuisances and blighted properties in neighborhoods were apparently not considered by the review board. For example, the statutes make reference to fire hazards, reduced property values, substantial announce to communities, and interference with residents’ use and enjoyment of their properties.

Most of the applicable Kentucky statues seem to apply to counties with a first-class city; (ironically, Kentucky only has one first-class city). However, their language could easily be included in Pulaski County’s nuisance ordinance, significantly strengthening it and providing firm legal recourse for offended residents.

For example, Kentucky Statute 82.710 states that when local governments enact a nuisance code, the ordinance should “provide for the establishment of a hearing board and hearing officers and the procedures to be followed by the hearing board and hearing officers.”

Apparently, Pulaski County has a review board. However, the county’s ordinance does not have a provision that establishes (1) a review board; (2) how board members are determined and by whom; (3) number of board members; (4) board procedures; and (5) controls to prevent conflict of interest. Further, Kentucky statutes on nuisance provide for a judge or jury to award damages to property owners adversely affected by the nuisance. The Pulaski County ordinance does not contain such a provision.

Without such provisions, a review board can act with impunity and be unduly influenced by wealthy, prominent citizens. Based on our experience, the county’s “nuisance” ordinance allows a review board substantial discretion, and it does not adequately address public nuisances, leading to judgments that are not always in the best interest of residential neighborhoods.

Al Steiner

Bob Sibal

Wondering Woods Drive

Somerset, KY 42503

1
Text Only
Letters
  • James Comer.jpg Comer: ‘People are fed up with old school politics’

    November 22, 2013 1 Photo

  • Chris Girdler Senate District 15.jpg Girdler has issues with Comer’s remarks at Chamber

    November 19, 2013 1 Photo

  • An Open Letter to the Community from LCRH

    March 31, 2014

  • Reader puts a face on battle over Libary

    November 28, 2012

  • When the parties are over, who will pick up the pieces?

    The City of Somerset recently voted to sell alcohol by drink and through store outlets. We believe that a number of city management members were quite pleased by this outcome by the support this vote received prior to that election. It means that the city will receive a boost in tax revenue, a big boost that will aid the city's financial picture greatly.
    A number of other Somerset citizens lament that vote because they have a number of realistic concerns regarding the consequences of that monumental decision. They are afraid, with reason, that the incidence of alcohol addiction will increase in proportion to the amount of alcohol consumed.We tend to share those concerns. Accidents, auto crashes, addiction related illnesses and social dysfunction related to alcohol will, by its nature increase.
    This vote comes at a time wherein methamphetamine and other drug addiction continues to soar. It seems that every issue of your paper carries stories about drug related violence, crimes, assaults and felonies of all description. How do you think the addition of an increasing alcoholism population will effect those numbers and this community? I am sure that the members of Somerset City management have considered that question and are seeking responsible solutions.
    We would like to suggest one: Help give Somerset something she has needed for decades, an effective and viable alcohol/drug treatment program. It is very doable and would prove to be very cost effective within a short period of time. We have all been misdirected to believe that we need to wage a "war on drugs" except that wars don't often have winners and America is far from winning the one we've been involved with since President Reagan declared it.
    Alcoholism and drug addiction are identical as disease entities, they share the same symptoms, pathology and, sadly, the same prospects of morbidity. On the positive side, they respond favorably to specific treatment.
    Localities where addiction was viewed realistically and treated effectively report high recovery rates and significant cost savings. The airline industry stated, in 1979 that they realized that they received $15 back for every dollar invested in employee addiction treatment. Sending addicts to prison is far more costly than sending them to treatment. Treatment works.
    I do not know what the projected sales of alcohol by the drink is, the city managers do, I'll bet. Well, if the city levied a 5-cent tax on each ounce of distilled alcohol, beer serving, and 4 1/2 oz. glass of wine, they would be able to fund a freestanding residential as well as an intense outpatient facility that would serve some 1,300 Somerset persons including their family members a year. Other funding would come from self pay, insurance, state and federal formula funds and court referrals.
    If readers of this letter care to discuss this issue further we give the editor of this newspaper permission to share our e-mail addresses to interested parties.
    We thank you for publishing this letter.

    Delbert Dyar
    Bronston, KY. 42518
    enidel@live.com

    Alden R. Phelps
    Bronston, KY. 42518
    adlenrphelps@newwavecomm.net

    August 30, 2012

  • '... Salt in the Wound'

    Dear Editor:
    As a Christian, local pastor and one who worked very hard with K.I.D.S. of Somerset in the recent local option election, I would like to express my disgust with the distasteful cartoons on your editorial page in the June 29 issue of the Commonwealth Journal.
    When the results of the local option election were announced on June 26 both sides of the issue were represented at the courthouse. I was pleased with how civilized both sides were in their reaction to the outcome. David Carr and I stood with Pastor Ed Amundson, spokesperson for K.I.D.S., as he was interviewed by CJ reporter Chris Harris.
    Bro. Amundson was very conciliatory in his response to all questions.
    In conversation with Mr. Harris after the interview Bro. Amundson was very careful to make sure there were no hard feelings remaining from the election in which passions ran very high on both sides of the issue.
    We had said we would and we did accept the result of a fair democratic process. My FB posts that night and the following day thanked those with whom I had labored in the process. I stated that I would pastor in a new Somerset with the same passion I have had since I came to Somerset almost 16 years ago. The city of Somerset had spoken loudly and I accepted the result.
    Mr. Weddle with Progress Somerset has been very gracious in his comments. As I stated earlier when the result was announced both sides conducted themselves in a very civil manner. The election was over so let’s move on. Then the editorial board of the CJ decides to rub a little salt in the wound.
    On Friday as I read the editorial page I found this very distasteful cartoon with the heading “Caution ‘Wet’
    Paint.” I must assume by this they are ready to paint the town, a term that I, in my mind, associate with drunken revelry. The first cartoon made light of the fact that we deemed the consequences of this vote serious enough that we would pray about it. The second cartoon seemed to insinuate that the only way we could handle defeat is to drown our sorrows in a very dry martini.
    Why would the CJ, which should have had a primarily journalistic interest in the Local Option Election, be taking a victory lap?
    Why belittle a group of people who simply had strong reservations about the benefit of legalized alcohol sales?
    Why make light of people who believe in prayer and of the God to whom they pray?
    What is the purpose?
    Does the CJ have more interest in stirring the caldron of division in our community than being responsible and fair reporters of the events that affect the everyday lives of all of our citizens?
    Could it be that the CJ has cast off the restraint of journalistic integrity and objectivity to we are not just happy to report the results but we are also happy with the results?
    By this very action the CJ has said that people who believe in God, people who pray and people who were against the legalization of alcohol in Somerset are worthy only of our ridicule and nothing more.
    It is very true that we, who were on the No side, were soundly defeated and I tip, not my glass, but my hat to you on the other side of the argument for the effectiveness of your campaign.
    To the CJ I say if your actions with these distasteful cartoons are a reflection of your excitement about the final tally or an attempt to make those of us on the No side irrelevant, I leave you with this: We are still here, not just sober and praying, but soberly praying, for the city we love and call home. 2,167 Yes, 1,464 No is the reality of June 26, but only history can reveal the true winners and losers on that day.
    Thank you,
    Johnny M. Dunbar
    Somerset, KY 42502

    July 19, 2012

  • Group opposed to alcohol at Eagle’s Nest

    Dear Editor:
    K.I.D.S. (Keep It Dry and Safe) of Somerset and Pulaski County is opposed to the sale of alcohol at the Eagle’s Nest Golf Course in the Caney Fork Precinct of Pulaski County, Ky.

    March 9, 2012

  • The Perils of Alcohol

    Dear Editor:
    The Feb. 1, 2012, front page news of the Commonwealth Journal, read in big, bold letters, ALCOHOL at Eagle’s Nest.

    February 9, 2012

  • Reenactment Poorly Planned

    Dear Editor:
    In response to the article by staff writer Chris Harris concerning the Battle of Mill Springs recently held in your county. I have concerns over the objectivity of the content, particularly with Bill Neikirk’s comments.
    I am a living historian and travel from Florida to Virginia taking part in approximately 30 events per year; thus, I do know something of which I speak.

    February 9, 2012

  • Rockcastle Hospital responds to article

    Dear Editor:
    This letter is in response to the article printed January 31, 2012, in the Commonwealth Journal titled “Local Nursing Homes on par with rest of nation.”  The article incorrectly noted that the only Kentucky nursing home with zero deficiencies was the Nursing Facility of Hardin Memorial Hospital in Elizabethtown. I would kindly ask you to correct the information to include our facility.

    February 6, 2012

News Live
AP Video
SKorea Ferry Toll Hits 156, Search Gets Tougher Video Shows Possible Syrian Gas Attack Cubs Superfans Celebrate Wrigley's 100th Raw: Cattle Truck Overturns in Texas Admirers Flock to Dole During Kansas Homecoming Raw: Erupting Volcanoes in Guatemala and Peru Alibaba IPO Could Be Largest Ever for Tech Firm FBI Joining Probe of Suburban NY 'Swatting' Call U.S. Paratroopers in Poland, Amid Ukraine Crisis US Reviews Clemency for Certain Inmates Raw: Violence Erupts in Rio Near Olympic Venue Raw: Deadly Bombing in Egypt Raw: What's Inside a Commercial Jet Wheel Well Raw: Obama Arrives in Japan for State Visit Raw: Anti-Obama Activists Fight Manila Police Motels Near Disney Fighting Homeless Problem Michigan Man Sees Thanks to 'bionic Eye' S.C. Man Apologizes for Naked Walk in Wal-Mart Chief Mate: Crew Told to Escape After Passengers
Hyperlocal Search
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide
Stocks